TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - So I have another thought >>>
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject So I have another thought >>>
     
Posted by Steve-O on March 09, 2007 at 8:34 PM
  This message has been viewed 52 times.
     
In Reply To Just brought my newly mounted wheels/tires home posted by Steve-O on March 09, 2007 at 05:16 PM
     
Message Other than water channeling, how could the tires be considered directional? They say the construction is such that they're meant to be rotating one way but lets see how the forces break down...

When the car is accellerating forward, the rear tires' contact patch sees a force tangential to the road and in the direction of the car's accelleration. When the car is braking, the front tires' contact patch would also experience frictional force tangential to the road and also direction of the cars accelleration, which, under braking, is in the direction opposite of the car's motion (negative accelleration).

Doesnt this suggest that any given tire is capable of handling forces in either the rotational or counter-rotational directions, since the manufactures don't specify the front or rear location for a tire? How, then, can there be a major difference (other than in water channeling) between running tires normally or backwards?

Maybe I'm smoking too much crack...

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.